ChERP
Back to home

ChERP vs Pushpay: what a quote-only contract hides

Last updated 2026-11-02

For a church council approving a budget, an unpublished price and a three-year term matter more than any feature comparison.

Comparison · 7 min read

Pushpay is an enterprise platform aimed at large churches, and in that bracket it is a serious product. It owns Church Community Builder, its giving tooling is mature, and it charges no setup fees. Large US multi-site churches run on it successfully every week.

It also publishes no price at all, and sells on one, two and three-year contracts with the balance owed if you cancel early. For a church council trying to approve a budget, those two facts matter more than any feature comparison.

Where Pushpay is genuinely better

  • Scale. Purpose-built for multi-site churches with thousands of members and complex campus structures.
  • Negotiated processing rates. At high giving volume, a negotiated rate can beat any published card rate, and that is a real advantage ChERP does not offer.
  • Church Community Builder brings a deep, long-established ChMS alongside the giving platform.
  • Onboarding and account management of a kind that only a contracted enterprise vendor provides.

What a quote-only contract hides

Five of the largest vendors in this category — Pushpay, Subsplash, Realm, Shelby Arena and MinistryPlatform — publish no list price. That is not automatically a red flag; larger churches genuinely do get better negotiated rates that way.

But it has three consequences that are easy to underestimate.

  1. You cannot shortlist without a sales process. Comparing three quote-only vendors means three discovery calls before you know a single number.
  2. You cannot budget. A church council approving next year's spend has no figure to approve until the process is complete.
  3. Cancellation is a liability, not a decision. With the balance of a multi-year term owed on early exit, leaving a platform that no longer fits becomes a financial event rather than an operational one.
The platforms least willing to publish a number are the ones aimed at the churches that most need one for a board conversation.

The full framing is in the hidden cost of quote-only church software.

The comparison

PushpayChERP
Published priceNoneR899 / R2,499 per month, public
Contract1, 2 or 3 years; balance owed on early exitMonthly, cancel any time
TrialDemo and sales process14 days, no card required
Target church sizeLarge and multi-siteChurch plant to ~2,000 members
Processing ratesNegotiatedPaystack / Paddle standard
CurrencyUSDZAR in South Africa, USD elsewhere
SA payment railsNot supportedPaystack local acquiring
Sage supportNoJournal export, plus live QuickBooks posting
Pastoral/finance separationRole-based, administrators see allEnforced at the data layer
POPIA framingGDPR/CCPAPOPIA and GDPR

Who each one is for

ChERP is not an enterprise replacement for Pushpay at a 10,000-member multi-site church, and claiming otherwise would be dishonest. Above roughly 2,000 members, an enterprise platform with negotiated rates and dedicated onboarding is the right shape of answer.

Below that — which is the overwhelming majority of churches in South Africa and across Africa — a multi-year contract in a foreign currency, with no published price and a cancellation liability, is a poor trade for a congregation of four hundred.

  • Choose Pushpay if you are large, multi-site, have the volume to negotiate processing, and want a contracted vendor relationship.
  • Choose ChERP if you want to know the price before the call, pay monthly in rands, leave whenever you like, and have finance and pastoral data properly separated.

More from the blog

This page is maintained by the ChERP team at Appetite Technology. It describes our current practices and is not an independent certification or legal advice. Questions? admin@cherp.co.za