ChERP vs Pushpay: what a quote-only contract hides
Last updated 2026-11-02
For a church council approving a budget, an unpublished price and a three-year term matter more than any feature comparison.
Comparison · 7 min read
Pushpay is an enterprise platform aimed at large churches, and in that bracket it is a serious product. It owns Church Community Builder, its giving tooling is mature, and it charges no setup fees. Large US multi-site churches run on it successfully every week.
It also publishes no price at all, and sells on one, two and three-year contracts with the balance owed if you cancel early. For a church council trying to approve a budget, those two facts matter more than any feature comparison.
Where Pushpay is genuinely better
- Scale. Purpose-built for multi-site churches with thousands of members and complex campus structures.
- Negotiated processing rates. At high giving volume, a negotiated rate can beat any published card rate, and that is a real advantage ChERP does not offer.
- Church Community Builder brings a deep, long-established ChMS alongside the giving platform.
- Onboarding and account management of a kind that only a contracted enterprise vendor provides.
What a quote-only contract hides
Five of the largest vendors in this category — Pushpay, Subsplash, Realm, Shelby Arena and MinistryPlatform — publish no list price. That is not automatically a red flag; larger churches genuinely do get better negotiated rates that way.
But it has three consequences that are easy to underestimate.
- You cannot shortlist without a sales process. Comparing three quote-only vendors means three discovery calls before you know a single number.
- You cannot budget. A church council approving next year's spend has no figure to approve until the process is complete.
- Cancellation is a liability, not a decision. With the balance of a multi-year term owed on early exit, leaving a platform that no longer fits becomes a financial event rather than an operational one.
The platforms least willing to publish a number are the ones aimed at the churches that most need one for a board conversation.
The full framing is in the hidden cost of quote-only church software.
The comparison
| Pushpay | ChERP | |
|---|---|---|
| Published price | None | R899 / R2,499 per month, public |
| Contract | 1, 2 or 3 years; balance owed on early exit | Monthly, cancel any time |
| Trial | Demo and sales process | 14 days, no card required |
| Target church size | Large and multi-site | Church plant to ~2,000 members |
| Processing rates | Negotiated | Paystack / Paddle standard |
| Currency | USD | ZAR in South Africa, USD elsewhere |
| SA payment rails | Not supported | Paystack local acquiring |
| Sage support | No | Journal export, plus live QuickBooks posting |
| Pastoral/finance separation | Role-based, administrators see all | Enforced at the data layer |
| POPIA framing | GDPR/CCPA | POPIA and GDPR |
Who each one is for
ChERP is not an enterprise replacement for Pushpay at a 10,000-member multi-site church, and claiming otherwise would be dishonest. Above roughly 2,000 members, an enterprise platform with negotiated rates and dedicated onboarding is the right shape of answer.
Below that — which is the overwhelming majority of churches in South Africa and across Africa — a multi-year contract in a foreign currency, with no published price and a cancellation liability, is a poor trade for a congregation of four hundred.
- Choose Pushpay if you are large, multi-site, have the volume to negotiate processing, and want a contracted vendor relationship.
- Choose ChERP if you want to know the price before the call, pay monthly in rands, leave whenever you like, and have finance and pastoral data properly separated.
More from the blog
This page is maintained by the ChERP team at Appetite Technology. It describes our current practices and is not an independent certification or legal advice. Questions? admin@cherp.co.za
